It’s a busy day at the clinic. The staff is ready, the rooms are prepped, and the schedule is packed. But as the clock ticks on, several patients fail to show up. The result? Wasted time, unused resources, and missed opportunities to provide care. For healthcare providers, this isn’t just an occasional inconvenience—it’s a persistent and costly problem that demands a solution.
Patient no-shows are not just a scheduling inconvenience—they represent a critical challenge for healthcare providers.
Patient no-shows occur when individuals fail to attend scheduled appointments without prior notice. While the reasons for missing an appointment vary—from forgetfulness to transportation issues—the consequences are universally negative for clinics and patients alike.
Think of A/B testing as a controlled experiment where you compare two groups—Group A and Group B. The goal? To find out which approach leads to better outcomes. In the context of patient no-shows, I asked a simple question:
Does the type of appointment reminder affect whether a patient shows up?
By tracking the no-show rates for each group, I could identify which reminder method was the most effective.
A/B testing offers more than just a way to reduce no-shows—it empowers healthcare providers to:
In the next post, we’ll dive deeper into how we designed this A/B test, from crafting the hypothesis to dividing patients into groups. You’ll learn about the importance of clean data, how to avoid biases, and the steps we took to ensure reliable results.