Last time, I introduced you to our three patient clusters and started piecing together the churn mystery. Now, it’s time to dive deeper into the factors driving patient churn and reveal how predictive modeling helps us act before patients disengage.
If churn is the problem, risk factors are the breadcrumbs leading us to the solution. So, what clues did the data reveal? Let’s find out.
Patient churn isn’t random—it’s driven by a combination of behavioral, logistical, and demographic factors. Here are the top culprits:
What I Found:
Why It Matters: Traveling to appointments can be a hurdle, especially for frequent visits. Long distances add stress, time, and cost, increasing the likelihood of disengagement.
What I Found: Patients with 3+ prior no-shows have a 60% churn rate, compared to just 18% for those with no prior no-shows.
Why It Matters: Missed appointments are a red flag. They often signal disengagement and can snowball into complete disengagement if left unaddressed.
What I Found:
Why It Matters: Infrequent appointments disrupt continuity of care, making it easier for patients to drift away. Regular interactions reinforce engagement and progress.
What I Found:
Why It Matters: Younger patients may have more unstable schedules, and financial constraints can create barriers to consistent care.
While each factor tells part of the story, the real power comes from analyzing how they interact. For example:
Understanding risk factors is only half the battle. To stay ahead of churn, we need to predict it before it happens. Enter: Random Forest, our algorithm of choice.
Feature Selection:
Training and Evaluation:
Performance Metrics:
Using the predictions, we’ve already seen significant improvements:
In the next post, I’ll show how we’re turning these insights into actionable strategies to improve retention and patient outcomes. From telehealth options to flexible scheduling, we’ll dive into the real-world changes inspired by data science.
Churn prediction isn’t just about numbers—it’s about understanding and supporting the people behind the data. By identifying who’s at risk and why, we’re making strides toward a more patient-centered approach to care.